Xul microsoft

Thanks Tom Hawack. Why didnt I think of that. I was right there copying the direct link anyway. Took me just a minute to download all 31 of them I want to keep. If you compare the hash with a match I would say its safe to use the file. Hash your files to start with and keep this copy in a text file to compare with in the future if you suspect the files has been modified if you have some issues. Complete themes can be downloaded the same way.

They are contained in the same. Personas themes I found can be downloaded by simply saving the whole webpage. Because there is no file to be downloaded. I opened the. Well, it is the main reason why I use FireFox. Look at v54 and the nonsense they have done to the downloads flyout. Firefox always ran fast and smooth here whatever the size of the XUL library.

Arguable and argued. This does not mean that XUL itself will go away. Replacing XUL in its entirety is a complex process and will still take months, if not years. By the way — as Tom Hawack has already said — the size of a library is not necessarily related to its performance. The xul dll contains a lot more than xul parsing code. Although named xul. It is v52 code with changes.

Most likely another fork might happen after 57 is released, if someone deems it to be too much of a dud. However it would be delightfully surprising to see this UXP repo attract enough browsers to maintain a browser based on it. Mozilla pretty much seems to have admitted failure to make any existing, XUL-supporting codebase into an embeddable, developer-friendly engine, platform or runtime:.

If this is a project to preserve the foundations of the classic Mozilla GUI and UX, for the time when Firefox eventually abandons them in the near future, why is there a screenshot of Google Chrome showing the relevant page on GitHub, but not Pale Moon, SeaMonkey, or even Firefox itself?? I fail to see how that is relevant… with anything. The screenshot belongs to the article here, not to the project.

Its a big undertaking for such a relatively small team like pale moon. Its time consuming just to keep pale moon updated nevermind taking something else on too. How on earth can half a dozen people at most maintain such a code when a global community struggles.?

Time will tell. Currently, later versions of Firefox will be unable to download these addons, though the download link can still be easily reached by digging into the source code. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Please click on the following link to open the newsletter signup page: Ghacks Newsletter Sign up. Mozilla plans to release a minor upgrade for the stable version of its web browser today. Firefox The connection issue was posted to Bugzilla , Mozilla's bug tracking site five days ago. The page , listing supported AMD processors by Windows 11, returned an error message and not the actual content. Firefox displays a Secure Connection Failed error page with the aforementioned error message.

The issue appears to come and go sporadically, but the planned update of Firefox will resolve it for all stable users of the web browser. The first affects the Linux version of Firefox only. The Bugzilla report suggests that crashes "have increased a bit over the last month" and that the crash takes down the entire browser and not just a single process. The next issue fixes a crash on Windows devices, specifically crashes when shutting down. The volume of crashes was exceptionally high according to Mozilla and made up about a quarter of the top 50 crash signatures reported to Mozilla during the time.

We heard there was a Windows update around that time. The final issue is again limited to Firefox running on Linux devices. It fixes a website contrast issue that some users experienced when Dark Mode was enabled on the operating system level. Does this also affect Firefox ESR The interface can be modded fairly extensively using CSS, useful to me because even the small version is still too big. Yeah, great browser. Fantastic job. Good developers. Sweet lord what a bag of turds this joke of browser has become.

Does your anger have anything to do with the what seems like monthly emergency patches for 0-day vulnerabilities in chromium browsers with the latest bag of turds having to be patched two days ago?! I like Firefox and I will continue to use it until I find another browser that I trust more. Compared to the amount of fixes Microsoft has had to issue recently FF pales. Sorry, not happening. Tried Linux once and also had a chance to try Apple and to me Windows is just easier and with Powershell which I find very good at automating things I will stay with Windows for now at least.

To each his own. The confusion passes fairly quicky, the limitations remain. Browsing is almost identical, other things take some digging. For many years there where addons that fixed this. The first I used was Keyconfig and later when addons where required to be signed another one called dorando-keyconfig worked instead. But then they pulled the rug for these XUL addons in Firefox 57 and there were no way to achieve this through the newer system.

So I could no longer change the keyboard shortcut. There are some workarounds like binary hacking Firefox , but I haven't gone that far. Still hoping for that 20 years old bug to be fixed…. It definitely sucked for users and all explanations were not enough to justify it. After all many extensions just disappeared with their functionality. It is somewhat hopeless to expect at least some of the functions to be included into a browser itself.